PREVIOUS DECISION LETTERS & PLANNING APPEALS

By
The Use of Inspectors' Decision Letters in Planning Appeals

Those involved in planning appeals often produce the decision letters of planning inspectors to bolster their cases. The argument being, of course, that the previous decision is similar to the one in front of the Inspector and should, therefore, be taken into account. However, the Inspector will often say “Each case on its merits” and place little weight on the decision letter which the party thought to clinch the deal. I many cases, this is because the person producing the decision letter has failed to do enough work. Had he done so, then the Inspector might have placed more weight on the cited decision letter.
Here is a quote from an Inspector in a recent decision letter:
“13. I acknowledge that the appellant has also referred to various successful appeal decisions where lawful development certificates for extended gardens have been granted.  However I have been provided with limited information regarding these cases, including how the scale of the sites compare with that of the present appeal site. “

Appeal Ref: APP/X1355/X/17/3181946 - Wood Cottage, Hesleden Road, Hesleden
The message is clear; namely, that the Inspector should be provided with evidence which shows the background to, and context of, the decision letter which we rely upon.
So what could have been supplied if one is relying on a previous decision letter ?  For a start, a small amount of research should provide copies of the location plans.  The decision rejected by the Inspector in the Wood Cottage appeal was in respect of a site in Clyst Hydon, Devon. A search of the LPA website came up with the location plan:

A tad more research produced an aerial photograph:


The production of these materials would have met the Inspector’s criticism and provided a fighting chance that he would give some weight to the previous decision.
My personal approach is that this exercise should be carried out on every occasion when a decision letter is put in evidence.


Comments

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

A SHORT ARTICLE ON LOBBYING

By
This article relates to R (Holborn Studios) v London Borough of Hackney [2020] EWHC 1509. One of the issues related to the submission of information to a member of the planning committee by way of lobbying and the reactions of both the member and the council when dealing with that information. An examination of the judgement shows that the analysis boiled down to two particular points which are worthy of further commentary. First, the question of whether or not this process involves considerations relating to freedom of expression. Secondly, perhaps more importantly, the way in which members and councils should react to lobbying.   The facts The facts of the case are relatively complicated because they include a long discussion about the rights and wrongs of an economic viability assessment which was presented to the council with the objective of demonstrating that the scheme was not capable of accommodating affordable housing. The developer had aspirations to redevelop a site for empl
Read more

BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN A SUITABLE CASE FOR TREATMENT?

By
  The Environment Act 2021 will promote biodiversity net gain by way of a number of mechanisms but principally by way of a statutory condition which will be imposed upon most substantial planning permissions. In a nutshell, the condition provides that the developer must provide a biodiversity gain plan to the local planning authority and that this plan must be approved prior to the commencement of development. At first blush, this seems like a relatively straightforward provision; however, it is arguable that it is not particularly well thought out. This article will explore the shortcomings in this approach and, also, discuss a possible methodology for overcoming those flaws A 'zero sum' problem The initial problem is an economic one. Those familiar with larger development schemes will now also be familiar with economic viability assessments. An economic viability assessment is a financial model for the scheme itself. It is a snapshot in time and the parameters of the mode
Read more

THE ADVANCE PAYMENTS CODE & THE 'SIX WEEK RULE'

By
I have found that many delegates from highway authorities are worried about the consequences of missing the six week deadline for the service of APC notices. This article considers that topic. The "advance payments code" The “advance payments code” (“APC”) means the code provided by sections 219 to 225 of the Highways Act 1980: Section 203(1).   The APC has effect for securing payment of the expenses of the execution of street works in private streets adjacent to new buildings: Section 204(2). The APC ensures that a sum equivalent to the likely costs of making up the private street is paid to the highway authority or secured before a new building is erected.   The objective of the exercise being to put the highway authority in the position of being able to step in and carry out the street works in the event that the developer fails to do so. A developer is not entitled to commence work (unless the works are exempted) on a building served by the st
Read more