PREVIOUS DECISION LETTERS & PLANNING APPEALS

By
The Use of Inspectors' Decision Letters in Planning Appeals

Those involved in planning appeals often produce the decision letters of planning inspectors to bolster their cases. The argument being, of course, that the previous decision is similar to the one in front of the Inspector and should, therefore, be taken into account. However, the Inspector will often say “Each case on its merits” and place little weight on the decision letter which the party thought to clinch the deal. I many cases, this is because the person producing the decision letter has failed to do enough work. Had he done so, then the Inspector might have placed more weight on the cited decision letter.
Here is a quote from an Inspector in a recent decision letter:
“13. I acknowledge that the appellant has also referred to various successful appeal decisions where lawful development certificates for extended gardens have been granted.  However I have been provided with limited information regarding these cases, including how the scale of the sites compare with that of the present appeal site. “

Appeal Ref: APP/X1355/X/17/3181946 - Wood Cottage, Hesleden Road, Hesleden
The message is clear; namely, that the Inspector should be provided with evidence which shows the background to, and context of, the decision letter which we rely upon.
So what could have been supplied if one is relying on a previous decision letter ?  For a start, a small amount of research should provide copies of the location plans.  The decision rejected by the Inspector in the Wood Cottage appeal was in respect of a site in Clyst Hydon, Devon. A search of the LPA website came up with the location plan:

A tad more research produced an aerial photograph:


The production of these materials would have met the Inspector’s criticism and provided a fighting chance that he would give some weight to the previous decision.
My personal approach is that this exercise should be carried out on every occasion when a decision letter is put in evidence.


Comments

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

NULLITY v VOIDABILITY AGAIN !!

By
The Court of Appeal and another conceptual wrestling match

The Court of Appeal decision in R.(Guled) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 92 was an immigration case which is of wider interest within the field of administrative law generally and, for the purposes of this Blog, planning and development.

The point of interest relates to a short debate about the perceived difference between ‘nullity’ and ‘invalidity’.An administrative action which is found to be unlawful can, sometimes, be characterised as being a ‘nullity’ (aka ‘void ab initio’ or just ‘void’) and the prevailing judicial wisdom is that an action which is a ‘nullity’ at law has no legal existence.An action which is said to be ‘invalid’ has a legal existence unless and until it may be quashed by the courts.There is, however, a major flaw in this seemingly simple distinction; namely, that the people may act upon, and change their positions, in reliance on something which a nullity in law. Thus, they …
Read more

A STRANGE TALE OF STONEHENGE

By
Image
Given that the summer solstice is fast approaching, it provides the excuse to regale those interested in highway law with a tale which comes close to being very strange.

It has to do with culs de sac[1], ancient monuments, the “vulgar public” and too much Latin.
Lord Eversley’s book “Commons, Forests and Footpaths The Story of the Battle During the Last Forty-Five Years for Public Rights Over the Commons, Forests and Footpaths of England and Wales” (Cassell & Co.) was published in 1910. He was the president of the, then, Commons Preservation Society (which later became the Open Spaces Society by merger). In part, the book explains the background to the fencing around Stonehenge and the legal battle which then ensued over it. As a broad generality, it is fair to say that it is difficult to show that a cul de sac is a highway.The problem being, of course, that it is not a through route.The conventional wisdom is that a highway is a route which connects two separate points.The conceptua…
Read more

NOTES ON THE ENVIRONMENT BILL

By
Image
Some time ago, I participated in a webinar about the Environment Bill.It was a short introduction to some planning aspects of the Bill.These notes are by way of a short summary of the points made in the webinar.The webinar focused upon the planning and development aspects of the Bill only and was limited to England only.In broad terms it went from general to particular; namely, from national policy to development control.[1]The starting point being, of course, national policy.I then went on to look at what I described as “Local Biodiversity Reports” and then to consider the impact of the Bill on development control.I hasten to add that the label “Local Biodiversity Reports” was my own label and did not figure in the Bill.The Bill introduces certain overarching environmental policies.Arguably, they will filter down to both local plans and development control.Clause 16 of the Bill requires the Secretary of state to prepare a “policy statement on Environmental Principles”. Clause 16 (2) …
Read more